<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: RAI surprise</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.penny-saved.com/2006/08/17/rai-surprise/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.penny-saved.com/2006/08/17/rai-surprise/</link>
	<description>Personal Finance and Wealth by the Penny</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 13:08:26 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: thatedeguy</title>
		<link>http://www.penny-saved.com/2006/08/17/rai-surprise/#comment-230</link>
		<dc:creator>thatedeguy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2006 21:33:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.penny-saved.com/2006/08/17/rai-surprise/#comment-230</guid>
		<description>Actually, no.  If they had issued as many shares as they already had, it would have diluted my shares.  A stock split gives 2 shares for every one share to each owner of record.  Basically, I own the same % as I did before, it's just in twice as many shares.
In the long term, as the dividends continue to increase, I get more and more from it.
It's actually quite good for the long term.
One of the side effects of it for the short term is that the stock looks better to the untrained eye.  Even though it is essentially the exact same , with the exact same numbers except for twice as many stocks, it has a price tag of half what it was.  Tell me, if Google dropped by $150 would you buy?  I would certainly think about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, no.  If they had issued as many shares as they already had, it would have diluted my shares.  A stock split gives 2 shares for every one share to each owner of record.  Basically, I own the same % as I did before, it&#8217;s just in twice as many shares.<br />
In the long term, as the dividends continue to increase, I get more and more from it.<br />
It&#8217;s actually quite good for the long term.<br />
One of the side effects of it for the short term is that the stock looks better to the untrained eye.  Even though it is essentially the exact same , with the exact same numbers except for twice as many stocks, it has a price tag of half what it was.  Tell me, if Google dropped by $150 would you buy?  I would certainly think about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: my new self</title>
		<link>http://www.penny-saved.com/2006/08/17/rai-surprise/#comment-229</link>
		<dc:creator>my new self</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2006 21:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.penny-saved.com/2006/08/17/rai-surprise/#comment-229</guid>
		<description>I'm not so sure it was that good. Doesn't it just mean that your shares are now more diluted?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not so sure it was that good. Doesn&#8217;t it just mean that your shares are now more diluted?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 1.615 seconds -->
