<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Flat tax, no tax, sales tax, or same tax?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.penny-saved.com/2006/09/08/flat-tax-no-tax-sales-tax-or-same-tax/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.penny-saved.com/2006/09/08/flat-tax-no-tax-sales-tax-or-same-tax/</link>
	<description>Personal Finance and Wealth by the Penny</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 19:01:47 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: David Bradley</title>
		<link>http://www.penny-saved.com/2006/09/08/flat-tax-no-tax-sales-tax-or-same-tax/#comment-244</link>
		<dc:creator>David Bradley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Sep 2006 22:24:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.penny-saved.com/2006/09/08/flat-tax-no-tax-sales-tax-or-same-tax/#comment-244</guid>
		<description>A flax tax on personal and corporate income would work - if properly structured. What evidence is there that it would fail? Look around you and you just see stunning success and economic growth: Hong Kong, Jersey, Estonia (and most of E Europe)...

A good starting point for a flat income tax (in the UK) would be to abolish 13,000 pages of tax breaks, reliefs, allowances etc. outlined in Tolley's yellow book.

In return for forsaking those, the rate would come down, say to around 20%. It would apply on all earned income, but there would be the principle of FAIR taxation - namely that you can only be taxed once. Therefore all capital, dividend and  inheritance taxes would go. Once shareholders pay corporation tax, that would be it. And to keep matters simple, corporation and personal income tax would be at the same rate.

Plus, to the benefit of all, the first £1,000 per month could be tax free - of both tax and national insurance. (Indeed the two would be merged into one.)

Now I can just hear all the cries from readers "how can this all be paid for??" Well, through economic growth. Plus what economists refer to as the "Laffer effect".

Now one can argue subjectively about the amount of growth being caused by greater incentive to work, less tax avoidance, less investing off shore, more inward investment, better capital formation (no 100% tax breaks for financially useless investments such as films) etc. But the important point is simply to look at the shear SIZE of evidence to support that a flat tax would generate massive economic growth and... collected tax.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A flax tax on personal and corporate income would work - if properly structured. What evidence is there that it would fail? Look around you and you just see stunning success and economic growth: Hong Kong, Jersey, Estonia (and most of E Europe)&#8230;</p>
<p>A good starting point for a flat income tax (in the UK) would be to abolish 13,000 pages of tax breaks, reliefs, allowances etc. outlined in Tolley&#8217;s yellow book.</p>
<p>In return for forsaking those, the rate would come down, say to around 20%. It would apply on all earned income, but there would be the principle of FAIR taxation - namely that you can only be taxed once. Therefore all capital, dividend and  inheritance taxes would go. Once shareholders pay corporation tax, that would be it. And to keep matters simple, corporation and personal income tax would be at the same rate.</p>
<p>Plus, to the benefit of all, the first £1,000 per month could be tax free - of both tax and national insurance. (Indeed the two would be merged into one.)</p>
<p>Now I can just hear all the cries from readers &#8220;how can this all be paid for??&#8221; Well, through economic growth. Plus what economists refer to as the &#8220;Laffer effect&#8221;.</p>
<p>Now one can argue subjectively about the amount of growth being caused by greater incentive to work, less tax avoidance, less investing off shore, more inward investment, better capital formation (no 100% tax breaks for financially useless investments such as films) etc. But the important point is simply to look at the shear SIZE of evidence to support that a flat tax would generate massive economic growth and&#8230; collected tax.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thatedeguy</title>
		<link>http://www.penny-saved.com/2006/09/08/flat-tax-no-tax-sales-tax-or-same-tax/#comment-242</link>
		<dc:creator>thatedeguy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Sep 2006 18:48:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.penny-saved.com/2006/09/08/flat-tax-no-tax-sales-tax-or-same-tax/#comment-242</guid>
		<description>I don't think that would work very efficiently.  Bill Gates makes millions a year, I make thousands.  For the sake of arguement, lets say that there are 2 billion people in America.  That means that the budget would get split 2 million ways.  That would be 10's of thousands of dollars a year each.  I don't think that would fly very well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think that would work very efficiently.  Bill Gates makes millions a year, I make thousands.  For the sake of arguement, lets say that there are 2 billion people in America.  That means that the budget would get split 2 million ways.  That would be 10&#8217;s of thousands of dollars a year each.  I don&#8217;t think that would fly very well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: josephwalter</title>
		<link>http://www.penny-saved.com/2006/09/08/flat-tax-no-tax-sales-tax-or-same-tax/#comment-243</link>
		<dc:creator>josephwalter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Sep 2006 18:17:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.penny-saved.com/2006/09/08/flat-tax-no-tax-sales-tax-or-same-tax/#comment-243</guid>
		<description>flat tax should be a dollar amount per person, not a percentage based on income. then we'd all share the burden of goverment squanderings equally.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>flat tax should be a dollar amount per person, not a percentage based on income. then we&#8217;d all share the burden of goverment squanderings equally.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
